These days enacted in the City of Bogota an agreement to amend the Police Code and avoid, as the Mayor, that children and teens see naked bodies. The idea is that in any setting bodies can show nudity or pornographic descriptions (in the words of the Act), for young people to see. I guess that the Mayor will want to target in some way to something that has to do with education left ... but I do not understand what it is.
Now the next step is when the state must come to define what the hell does "pornographic descriptions." Then reappears eternal argument between moralists and artists who have tried to find the exact place where it differs from porno erotic, without satisfactory results. People, for various reasons, seem to run away from the image of another human being naked, as if they recognized in the other-or maybe-monsters themselves when stripped of their clothes.
From my point of view is nothing but hypocrisy (and a demonstration of "tremendous desire" to have our Lord Mayor to get to work on serious things), but again emphasize the enormous error which is the State comes to decide and impose on those things that are his. To me, at least, it bothers me that the Council come and tell me what I consider as art and as pornography, more so in this era when anyone can go online and find out what pleases you that is like, with or without state permission.
deprecated now the Song of Songs or Sor Juana Inés de la Cruz, the Venus de Milo or Cabanel, sure that is porn which they see in art, will be a man without honor.
0 comments:
Post a Comment